Enter the V@x

(twitter)

"Christopher Langan Yesterday at Comment: "I've been wondering if there was a nefarious motivation behind the V@x. If I were an sociopathic oligarch and thought mankind needed to be reduced massively to protect the earth, would I use the vax to cause a mass die off, or would I cause mass sterilization? While either approach would cause huge turmoil, the mass sterilization might cause the least disruption."

Response: First, according to the usual definition of "vaccine", the current injections are not "vaccines". They are just another strain of dangerous technology that the parasitic overclass is funding and using for the purpose of global domination and control. A mass human die-off would be traumatic and threaten the status quo. If the human population crashes and the economy follows suit, the elite will have nothing, no innate superiority or adaptivity, that might protect them and conduce to their survival. Hence, they prefer mass sterilization and a slower (but still rapid) population decline. Obviously, the parasitic overclass is worried that its environment is being destroyed by human overpopulation. Unfortunately, it's right about that - whereas the Earth and its resources are finite, population growth is exponential. But there are at least three major problems with their approach.

(1) Instead of addressing population control the right way, by upgrading the population through education and genetic hygiene, appealing to what is best in the human species, and convincing it to control its own reproductive behavior for its own good and that of the Earth, they prefer to lie and sneak around behind everyone else's back. conning and threatening us into "vaccination" on false pretenses. Hence, their conspicuous neglect of Logos. Instead of upgrading humankind, they are degrading it, relying on a combination of public ignorance, misplaced trust, and dead-end ideas and ideologies like atheism, materialism, communism, multiculturalism and forced ethnic "diversification", and tyrannical "global governance" to snooker humanity into compliance.

 

(2) While the global elite desperately want total control of the planet including its human population, they are neither intelligent nor morally good enough to deserve it, and have no idea how to properly use it to the advantage of the human species and the planet as a whole.

(3) This is reflected in the fact that their control agenda is limited to quantity control and totally excludes quality control. They assume that all the true genetic wealth of mankind resides in themselves despite their conspicuous lack of merit (genius, moral rectitude). Subscribing to an outworn idea called "Social Darwinism", they simply assume that everyone else, no matter how much better and how much smarter one may be, is inferior and expendable and should be either culled or sterilized, or downbred, deracinated, and melted into a vast mocha-colored slave race for elite convenience.

In short, by virtue of stuffing their pockets and pushing everyone else around, the elite consider themselves a "Master Race", a kind of global livestock breeding association to which the rest of the species is nothing but a herd of docile cattle to be bred for servility and barely enough intelligence to follow orders. This has been clearly and irrefutably documented by, e.g.. the "White genocide" agenda described a century ago by R.N. Coudenhove-Kalergi, originally funded by the Rothschilds, Warburgs, and other international banksters and now pursued as international policy throughout the Western World. It's easy to see where this leads, and it's nowhere good. Personally, I'm willing if necessary to do severe physical harm to anyone attempting to force one of these injections on me, and the same should be true of any other decent self respecting person."
(Christopher Langan has a confirmed IQ off 200+ btw)

"Q: Why would the global plantation owners want to kill off or reduce the fertility of their most subservient, obedient subjects?

A: You may not quite understand. Resisting the "vaccine" helps the elite identify you as someone who is better killed and therefore eligible for "lead vaccination".

Besides, they think they can force everyone to take the "vaccine", so it´s moot. Take it now, and you may be eligible for zombification and enslavement as a chemical cybotg; don' take it, and your ripe for culling, no "vaccine" required. Any "worthwhile" slaves who die immediately acceptable collateral damage; besides, every death serves the depopulation agenda.
(Never assume that these control addicts haven't calculated every move for its "Heads we win, tails you lose" value. Even when they don't know their asses from their elbows, which is quite often, this is their primary policy criterion.

Remember, the elite $uppose$ themselve$ to be the genetic creme-de-la-creme, and assume that everyone else is genetically inferior garbage and thus ultimately susceptible to theit mind-control techniques. This is a mass-scale operation in which human error makes it impossible to efficiently select for "quality", whether quality is defined on objective merit, or serviceability to the parasitic overclass.

In the elite worldview, only the elite are "elite". Everyone else is shit and therefore expendable."

Amen.
And now, proudly presented:
The Delta (plus) variant!

"Fact check: What do we know about the coronavirus delta variant?"

"The delta variant is now present in more than 80 countries. More transmissible than the alpha variant, it is sparking concerns of further loss of lives and lockdowns."
Is the variant more dangerous, more contagious, more deadly, or how or what?
Are the vaccines helping?
Answer: no idea. But we need to talk about it.

"There is still little data available about whether the delta variant causes more deaths."

"The delta variant has multiple mutations. Scientists don't know the exact function of these mutations at this point in time but they are associated with allowing the virus to bind to the cells of humans and helping the virus to escape some immune responses, said Deepti Gurdasani, a clinical epidemiologist at Queen Mary University of London."

"A PHE study pending peer review found that Pfizer-BioNTech's vaccine was 94% effective against hospitalizations after one dose and 96% effective after two doses. AstraZeneca's vaccine was 71% effective after one dose and 92% effective after two doses.

For Pfizer-BioNTech, efficacy against symptomatic disease by the delta variant was 36% after one dose and 88% after two doses. For AstraZeneca, it was 30% after one dose and 67% after two.

"That doesn't mean there's no protection," Gurdasani says. "But there is definitely reduced protection from infection only or asymptomatic mild disease, especially at one dose, but also at two doses.""

Blah, blah, blah.
(dw.com)

Seriously: Who still believes in this pandemic fairy tale is really beyond help. He should lie down & wait for death.
All others should consider how they can adjust to the changes and use them, if possible, to their advantage. Or, if they think it makes sense, how they can fight against it.
To deal with this nonsense at all, even if it is only for a minute, is a waste of precious life time.